Demanding Accountability

WWW US~Observer

Subscribe to the US~Observer News Flash Alerts!

Get a subscription
to US~Observer delivered right to
your mailbox via
first-class mail!

Click Here for more information

 

The Truth Shall
Set Her Free?

Dear Editor;

I'm a member of findmissingkids.com and came across the story you posted on little Kelsey....if all is true it has woke me up to remember not all is known when a crime is done to a child or any one. I my self just want justice for murdered and abused children...this case is sad like all the rest..but to read the whole truth is far more important..thank you for posting your research ... I have not heard any of this on the news stations...the truth is what justice is about. Little Kelsey was the victim..just awful that her own grandmother would tell so many un-truths. I pray all the truth will be told in the court room.

Some one who cares

---

Editor:

I just finished reading this article and want to thank him from the bottom of my heart for writing what others would not report on.

I’m forwarding this to friends so that the truth can come out.

Sincerely,

Shadawn Baker

• Vice President of Lincoln County Foster and Adoptive Parent Association – 2007
• President of Lincoln County Foster and Adoptive Parent Association – 2005 & 2006

---

OK Incarceration

To the Editor;

I have just read "Oklahoma-Land of Incarceration" by Verna Wood. A very enlightening article since I have a granddaughter who was just sentenced to 20 years for "enabling child abuse". Her live in boyfriend hurt the baby while she was at work. The trial was held in her small town in Miami, OK where she knew most people on the jury which included a member of her ex-husbands family. The public defender never got in touch with any family members to testify in her behalf or anyone in her behalf. Her parents are indigent & the rest of the family are in other states. We are retired & her aunt & uncle are working class people, so hiring an attorney for $20.000 - $25,000 is out of the question. When I saw this site I thought someone may at least point us in a direction that may get her some help.

Monica K.

---

First-Look Reviews of
“IRS ‘Con’spiracy”

Dear Ed,

Your article is quite good, sir. You are so right about the lack of the law. Indeed, there is none.

Having said that, I am glad to hear that the Mathies are going to stand on the truth. My question is: How are they going to stand on the truth? No, I'm not asking about the truth itself; you did an entirely adequate job of articulating that. I want to know "how" they are going to stand on the truth, and that is an entirely different matter.

You mentioned the Tom Cryer case, so let me explain my position by way of his case. Tom Cryer has trumpeted for the last several months that he believes he was born to fight the income tax issue, inferring, at least in my mind, that he wanted to set a precedent that would be beneficial to all. While I am overjoyed whenever I hear of someone beating the beast---Vernice Cougland, Joe Banister, etc. and now Tom Cryer---I really was hoping for more out of his case. While he has shown that the IRS can be beaten---so did Cougland and Banister, among others---Cryer's case had the potential of doing more. I corresponded with him via e-mail just after I heard of his victory. I wanted to know why he hadn't gone after the liability statute. He said that his first concern was to save his own skin. Certainly I understand that; that is always true---in every case. However, the issue of the liability of statute had the potential to not only save his skin, but also to accomplish so much more.

We all know that section 7203 is only a penalty statute carrying no liability whatever. So when the charging document alleges "in words" that he is liable for the tax, i.e., that he is required to file and pay, there must a be a liability statute supporting the allegation. Effectively, since we are talking about a statutory offense, such an allegation "in words" amounts to hearsay evidence, i.e. the IRS told me you were liable. Clearly, "A" cannot testify to what "B" saw first hand. Likewise the prosecutor cannot not allege failure to perform, and witnesses on the stand cannot support or infer failure to perform, without the supporting testimony of the statute mandating performance. Yes, I do realize this isn't a perfect analogy, but surely you get my drift: an allegation of a statutory offense must be supported by a statutorily defined mandate. What is it? Name it!

Absent the liability statute in the Cryer case, there is no charge for Cryer to defend against. My question: Why didn't Cryer go after the liability statute? And if he did, why didn't he push it for all its worth? In my mind that would look like: 1. File a Demand for Bill of Particulars; 2. if that is denied, go to the Circuit Court on an interlocutory appeal; 3. If that is denied, appeal to the US Supreme Court. Bear in mind that this man is a very well studied attorney who says straight up, over and over, that there is no law requiring most of us to file and pay, i.e., there is no liability statute. And, apparently he didn't go after it. Why the hell not? Instead he decided to take a shot in the dark and hope for the best with a jury. While certainly he would be able to mount a much stronger case than most of us, that is no excuse for not going after the liability statute.

Getting back to the Mathies' case, I suggest that they need to file a Demand for Bill of Particulars and push it to the wall. Going to trial is a shot in the DARK, even when one is right. The thing to remember is: if there is no liability statute cited in the charging document, there is no charge to plead to or to defend against. That is what should be clearly stated in the Demand for Bill of Particulars. If one is forced to trial, they have already gotten away with murder, even if one manages an acquittal. The Mathies should not allow this thing to go to trial.

Please send this note to them.

Alan Painter
Sedona, Arizona

---

Ed,

...thanks for this excellent reporting. Fortunately, juries in these cases are really getting smarter. All it takes is one juror to ask the question: please, sir, can you show us the law?

Hawk
Santa Fe, NM

---

Dear Mr. Edward Snook
and R.S. Errol,

I just read your article “IRS “Con”spiracy Charge in Montana America’s Creating Debtor Prisons”

For the past year or so, I have been pursuing and following all information in regards to Tax laws and cases, and I have yet to see anyone publish anything anywhere on who you can contact to get legal help from in case the IRS or DOJ contacts me in regards to my tax filings.

You are the first one I have seen that has stated “contact me”, although many provide instructions and forms with disclaimers.

Thus, what does one do and what course of action does one take, to not only avoid a confrontation with the IRS, but to fend them off when they come calling, in regards to Tax allegations or questions?

The average American does not have the financial resources to fight a governmental agency who has unlimited financial backing. It is not so much the fear of taking on an agency as it is a fear of financial indebtedness and ruin.

Looking for your guidance and advice on how we go about securing our freedom without financial disaster and being caught by the craftiness of Federal law enforcement.

I have subscribed to your mail lists and book marked your site.

Best Regards,

G.M.

---

To the Editor

I have been reading, with great interest I might add, your recent articles on the internet about the IRS.

At first I didn’t believe them. I thought to myself, what if we all quit paying income taxes and then, how would our government keep operating? I then started thinking about government waste and the billions of dollars our so-called government is sending to people overseas and that they are spending on illegal aliens who should be deported rather that coddled.

Next, I called my tax attorney and asked him about the statements you made regarding the income tax. I was shocked! He verified everything you wrote about. He told me that Congress has not passed a law requiring us to pay this tax and then he started in on the conflict of interest that federal judges have when they rule on tax cases that come before them. He told me that they all receive their pay checks directly from the Treasury Department. This explains why they withhold evidence from court and like you state, direct juries to find people guilty when they are charged with a tax related crime. How deceived we have been!

Thanks so much for your insightful articles and I apologize for questioning you. My family and I have read the Observer for years and have never found you wrong on any subject. You shouldn’t get “puffed up” but you do deserve a huge “pat on the back”.

Sincerely,

Carl Graves
Sacramento, CA

---

Josephine County “Incident”

Dear Editor,

I have always been a supporter of our country and am native to our valley. However, my feelings have definitely changed thanks to the fine service my husband and I have received.

On May 21st my husband was involved in a 3-vehicle accident (a JoCo transit vehicle, ours and another). There was a citation issued to the county employee. The next morning we filed the proper paperwork at the county personnel department where I was met with nothing but irritation, apparently for knowing to file against them and not our own insurance. If a person knows anything about insurance - you don't file your own when you are not at fault. That is, if you don't want to deal with the hassle of it showing up on your record for years to come and having to fight it every time. Ask any insurance agent.

It is now June 1st and I have called countless employees and departments trying to get the county to take action, but to no avail. The county insures itself and has the "right" to take up to 25 days to "investigate" the "incident". The whole situation is termed an "incident" not an accident as they are not accepting liability. I'm sorry, but it was my understanding the police officer at the scene of the "accident" that took photos, statements from independent witnesses (3 of them), as well as citing the county driver, made the scene pretty crystal clear.

Thank you to our Public Safety Officers. The county investigator just called and informed us, yet again, that they do not want to accept liability and that we should just claim it against our own insurance. Our own insurance can then file against them to get the money back. Meanwhile, our vehicle which has the damage from the ACCIDENT is sitting at a body shop waiting for them. We have been told that we should just go and rent a car and IF they decide to take liability they will reimburse us. When I asked where and to whom I should send litigation papers to if needed, they informed me it would be to the same department and staff handling my "incident" now. NICE!!!

I wonder how many citizens like us are out there? How many in JoCo have been held hostage by the "circle of safety" they have set up for themselves? Has anyone else been involved in an auto "incident" with our county?

Not that they care, but they no longer have my support.

NMLambert
Grants Pass, OR

---

District Attorney Steven Campbell

Dear Observer:

What is going on with your battle against our district attorney? Just months ago people were protesting him in front of the court house.

I read your article about Campbell’s false prosecutions with great interest because I have a brother who is currently being destroyed by this demon. We had high expectations when the Feds’ cut off the O&C funding and were devastated when they restored the money for one year. The only way to stop Campbell is to cut his money.

I don’t want to name my brother in this letter because his case is ongoing. His ex has lied about him and Campbell is running with the lie. There has been no investigation, just a district attorney listening to and then believing a lie. This fiasco has cost him almost everything he has and for what?

I wish I could be more specific about the case but I can’t. His lawyer has ordered him not to speak with anyone about his case and even though I have begged him to scream, he won’t. My husband and I have watched his case for months now and the attorney has done nothing but to strip him of his money.

Just as soon as possible we plan on contacting you to see if you can help in any way. Sorry for the evasiveness.

Editors Note: The protests against our corrupted District Attorney Steven Campbell will start again as soon as the weather cools down. As for your brother; there isn’t anything anyone can do for him as long as he buys into his attorney’s lies. If he doesn’t wake up and fight, then he will end up with a guilty verdict one of these days.

Our community is not safe as long as we have a dangerous and arrogant district attorney in office. Add to this fact the fact that we have public officials like Josephine County Commissioner Dwight Ellis lying to the public on public access television during a recent budget hearing at the Ann Basker building. Ellis stated what a good man Campbell is and another person on the budget committee lied his, you know what off, when he stated that Campbell and his predecessor, Clay Johnson are wonderful people. The budget committee member is as deceived as it gets and Ellis is simply an ignorant liar. I don’t need to name the committee member because he is supposedly connected to God, therefore I’ll let God handle him and his conscience. Hopefully he will face his public lies and repent.

As for Campbell and Clay Johnson – they are factually evil and I promise you that Campbell is not going to like living in Josephine County, Oregon in the near future. They are both guilty of prosecuting innocent people.

Give us a call and we’ll get you in touch with those who will be protesting crooks in front of the court house in the near future.

---

Deer Creek Ranch - NTS

Dear Editor:

Could you please tell me what is going on with the Deer Creek Ranch issue. I have read your articles on National Trust Services and haven’t seen anything lately on this issue.

My wife and I invested with NTS and the ranch and feel that we have been cheated. We can’t do anything about it because the IRS has been attacking those who ran this company as well as the folks who invested. Is there any chance that we will ever get money back?

Please don’t publish our names.

Seattle, Washington

Editor’s Note: You can expect more headlines on the Deer Creek Ranch in the near future. Our corrupted courts awarded the ranch to Karla Prescott, who is nothing more or less than a deceptive criminal. Her husband Rick Prescott, who is also a criminal, is awaiting trial on federal felony charges. He should be going to trial in Medford, Oregon this fall.

We have been investigating this case and related cases for the past two years and more information will be published as soon as “behind the scene” activities are accomplished. Hopefully investors will get money returned to them – if government doesn’t steal it all first…

---

Vick’s indictment is a sick,
disgusting read

To the Editor:

The indictment of Michael Vick is the sickest, most disgusting thing I can ever remember reading. Sen. Byrd of West Virginia said it best: “I am confident that the hottest places in hell are reserved for the souls of sick and brutal people who hold God’s creatures in such brutal and cruel contempt.”

I want Bud Adams and Jerry Jones (I’m a faithful Cowboy fan since the ’60s) to know that if Michael Vick ever wears an NFL uniform again I will have nothing further to do with the NFL or any of its sponsors.

Please, spare me the “we have to wait till he’s convicted” garbage.

Anyone, after reading the indictment, taking that position probably thinks O.J. is still looking for the real killers!

Jerry Spencer
Thompson’s Station, TN

Editor’s Note: God forbid if you are ever chosen to sit on a jury. It is people like you who are aiding and abetting in the destruction of this nation. Accuse a person, run him through a sham hearing wherein you disallow any of his evidence, sentence him and then throw away the key. Or, in your case, avoid any trial, just charge a person and rule them guilty. Your mindset is both sad and dangerous.

---

Innocent

Dear Observer,

Thank you for saving our daughter. When we contacted you last year we had nearly given up on the legal system. Rebecca was innocent and as you well know her attorney was selling her down the river. If our baby had been sent to prison we would have all been ruined. Without Ron Lee and the US~Observer there was really no future for us. Bill, Rebecca and I thank you all from the bottom of our hearts.

Grace Richardson
Atlanta, Georgia

---

Sign-up for our free e-mail News Flash Alerts!

Subscribe Me!