Coddling
Commissioners?
To the
Editor:
I see from reading your
last edition that you are supporting the current Josephine County Board
of Commissioners. Your reporter John Taft states that Daily Courier
reporter Shaun Hall is “allowing Sheriff Daniel and Sgt. Stephen
Clarke to pound on the County Commissioners whose hands are tied behind
their backs.” I hardly think this fair play as Mr. Taft has done
plenty of pounding himself on many issues without the need for third
party involvement. I don’t necessarily support the commissioners
from what I’ve read so far. The jury is still out on the subject;
While I love reading the
Observer for information and news that other media won’t touch
I can’t understand why you would lighten up on public officials.
They all become corrupt at some point after being elected and I think
it best to not coddle them at all.
Don’t take me wrong.
I agree with you 99% of the time, I just have got used to you exposing
these devils and your public dissemination of the truth. Please get
back to hammering and leave the coddling to the Grants Pass Daily Courier
and other papers like it.
Thank You
Gary Whitmore
Medford, Oregon
Editor’s
Note: Gary – We don’t coddle anyone and when a public official
has some good coming we gladly give it to them. Our commissioners are
attempting to prepare for the devastation that will come from the probable
loss of our O&C funds. Two of them have made some huge mistakes,
so I guess the jury is out with us as well. Keep reading the Observer
and please realize that we are here to promote good government and therefore
should reward the good with good press. P.S. They aren’t all devils!
Drunk Driving in Medford, Oregon
Dear Editor:
Thanks for the Citizen Review
Board article on the Medford Police Department.
Curt Chancler hit the nail
right on the head with this one. We had a bad run-in with a couple very
rude and unprofessional officers recently. We went to a party with another
couple and we all had a few drinks this fall, except for their daughter
who was acting as our designated driver. We were leaving a pretty much
public party and I believe the police were just waiting for people to
leave so they could pull them over.
They pulled her over on
Barnett Rd. and gave her a field sobriety test, after which they arrested
her for drunk driving. We told them she hadn’t had anything to
drink and the only response was an angry, “shut-up.”
After she received further
testing she was released without any charges, however it ruined everyone’s
evening. The cops were rude and they were wrong, not to even mention
the money they cost us that night.
Curt Chancler is right!!
We need a Citizen Review Board.
Cathy Bennette
Ashland, Oregon
Thank You, Thank You
To the Editor:
We have been following your
articles on the corrupt Club 71 meat market and we appreciate your courage
when you expose these scum.
Southern Oregon doesn’t
need strip bars and we sure don’t need a Supreme Court that condones
them as well as live sex acts.
Oregon’s courts are
becoming a laughing stock and many of us are actually embarrassed over
them. They judge what is constitutional and what is not when most of
them have no morals or character. This is seen in the perverse rulings
they make.
We have enclosed subscriptions
for two friends and plan to do the same each month.
Please—keep up the
excellent work all of you do at the US~Observer.
Bill and
Carol Price
Josephine County
Doggone Discrimination
To The
Editor:
In September, I spent four
days in a motel in your fair city of Grants Pass, Or. During that time
I called ALL the Property Management places in your fair city. I also
answered ads in the local newspapers.
NOT ONE PERSON WOULD RENT
ME A DUPLEX OR A SMALL HOUSE BECAUSE I HAVE TWO SMALL OLD DOGS.
I ALSO HAVE FOUR GOOD REFERENCES,
BUT THAT WAS NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
I have traveled quite extensively
since I retired with my small dogs and I have NEVER come across discrimination
against dogs like I did in the city of Grants Pass, OR.
I had hoped to live close
to my daughter and family who live in Coos Bay, Or.
Sincerely,
Irene Shields
Dam It
Editor;
President Bush pleaded for
lessor important projects like Savage Rapids Dam to be pulled (30 million
dollars plus) to help New Orleans, all of Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi,
coastal communities devastated by three hurricanes. Thirteen thousand
five hundred local signers knew Savage Rapids Dam was not a fish killer
like Senators Wyden and Smith have stated time and again. National Marine
Fisheries have concluded (in a press release) that Columbia River dams
do not jeopardize, threaten, or endanger runs of salmon. Doesn't this
eliminate the removal of the dams as an option in salmon recovery or
discrimination against the clean hydro small dams?
We the people, must ask
in writing, E-mail or by calling Congressman Greg Walden (541-776-4646)
to speak for us to President Bush. We, as Americans, have God given
duties to help other Americans. Our present brilliant leadership (in
my opinion) has wasted millions of fire killed trees in the Biscuit
fire while nit-picking about this and that. The same goes with Savage
Rapids Dam and Elk Creek dams in the middle of a drought and a looming
energy gridlock crisis. Please don't follow their leadership, protest
like the enviro's.
Endangered Species Act,
fish and owls are more important than suffering Americans to politicians,
VOTE THEM OUT!
Lyle Woodcock
Josephine County
$400 a Day for a County Treasurer
Editor:
I am appalled that Josephine
County Treasurer John Harelson is making $400.00 per day as reported
in the Observer. I haven’t stopped thinking about the issue since
reading the article a couple weeks ago.
What are our commissioners
doing about this? What are they doing about the other officials who
are being paid like they were Kings and Queens? I for one am sick of
hearing about all the problems over money shortages in Josephine County.
In light of the wages and perks being paid I must assume that no one
is really doing anything to remedy anything.
Voters need to start acting
on the big issues and it seems that the Observer is the only paper here
that is willing to take on such issues. What can we do to stop giving
the farm away to the few who act like they are running things when they
are really just running things into the ground.
I for one am willing to
take action. I am tired of useless rhetoric. Do our commissioners plan
to correct the absurdities or don’t they.
Jeri Hart
Josephine County
The Great Farce
To the
Editor;
I was a somewhat disinterested
bystander nearly 40 years of age, but I do remember the temper of the
times around 1965. The well established city businesses were losing
trade to new suburbs, largely formed without zoning regulations. Street
cars that had been used to keep business down-town were being scrapped.
Not to just wither away, the prominent city businesses expanded to the
suburbs.
The United States Congress
didn't have a remedy, but they thought they did. That was to zone the
entire nation and put a lid on development, rather than allow natural
market forces to determine development. The attempt to find a constitutional
means took considerable energy. If only there had been a precedent.
Zoning in municipalities wasn't a precedent, because persons entering
municipalities yielded some of their property rights to that municipality
upon entering. A municipality normally owns all rights to regulation,
including rights of eminant domain. But, to zone outlying areas wasn't
a trade, so it was an outright seizure; obviously unconstitutional unless
"just compensation" had been paid. But, States have the responsibility
for the safety of business ingress and egress on the property. To expand
definitions arbitrarily would have been unconstitutional (which may
have been done, although I am uncertain). But, the Congress had "discovered"
a precedent for such zoning (a "taking") without "just
compensation". The unlikelihood that there could have been such
a thing made it look like an "invention" by Congress. The
normal likelihood of such a precedent is so unheard of and remote, it
is very likely that more than 99% of those effected had never heard
of such a precedent. If that isn't a FARCE, what could be? It certainly
isn't INTEGRITY. (DID THEY MAKE IT SO JUST BY PRETENDING IT WAS?) It
seems that "making it Constitutional" should be more complicated
than that.
Charles
McManama
Estacada, Oregon
A Message From OFFPAC
Dear Friend
of Gun Rights,
The upcoming election season
will determine who will be making laws for gun owners in Oregon, and
there is still time for you to make your voice heard at no cost.
As you may know, contributions
to political action committees qualify for an actual tax credit. That
means that you can contribute up to $100.00 and take that amount off
any taxes you'll owe the State of Oregon for 2005.
That's quite a deal. But
you have to act before the end of the year and that time is fast approaching.
If you have not already
made a donation to OFFPAC, would you consider doing so now, while you
can still take advantage of the credit for this year?
We hope so, because your
donation to OFFPAC will help us elect ethical men and women to office,
and expose those who will attack your gun rights.
For complete information
on taking advantage of the Oregon political tax credit, and convenient
and secure on-line donations, please use this link: http://oregonfirearms.org/offpac/index.html
Thank you for your support
for gun owner's rights in Oregon, and best wishes for a joyous Christmas
season from OFFPAC.
Kevin Starrett
OFFPAC