By Ted Williams
Pendelton is buried 9 blocks to the west of my home on the Southside
of Chicago. I drive past
almost every single day.
9 blocks to the north of my home is the monument to murdered teenagers
erected by CNN Hero Diane Latiker and her organization Kids off the Block.
CNN broadcasted live from this monument in light of the President’s
recent visit to Chicago to discuss the issue of gun violence in the nation.
I have close friends, family members, and students whose lives have been
unalterably shattered by this epidemic. The conversation about gun violence
is personal as my community represents ground zero of this issue nationally.
As a result, I am increasingly angered and frustrated by the partisan and
myopic rhetoric I hear surrounding solutions to this problem by our national
by the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, President Obama and Democratic
to ban assault rifles, close the gun show
loophole, and push for universal background checks for all gun purchases.
I respect these efforts as step in addressing this crisis. However, it is
extremely disappointing to know that even if this agenda is passed tomorrow,
it would do little to address the crisis we face in cities like Chicago.
According to FBI data, in 2011 there were 12,664 murders in the United States.
6,220 cases used handguns, 323 used rifles of some sort, including assault
rifles, and 356 used shotguns. If we also consider the over 19,000 suicides
by firearms (69% by handguns), we must acknowledge that assault rifles are
not our nation’s most significant problem. Although our most recent
mass shootings predominately used these weapons, if we eliminate assault
rifles completely, America still has a very serious problem on its hands.
The rarely discussed
truth surrounding the issue of gun violence in the United States is that
both the left and the right make valid points in their
assessments. The left is correct in recognizing that easy access to high
powered guns makes it extremely likely that those guns will be used by people
desiring to inflict harm on others. Evidence has proven this time and time
again. While stricter sentencing can help (the Chicago Police Chief stated
recently that under New York State’s gun laws, Hadiya Pendleton’s
killer would have served a 3 yr. minimum for gun possession and would have
been free to take her life), the right’s assumption that legally purchased
guns do not contribute to this problem is a false one. Since 2000, more than
half of the guns seized by police in Chicago came from other states. A recent
University of Chicago study showed that over 1,300 guns confiscated by police
since 2008 were purchased at one Indiana store. Thousands of legally purchased
guns from other areas land on the streets of Chicago each year and contribute
to the city’s widespread crime. Additionally, the false dichotomy between
the “good guys” and the “bad guys” in the world represents
an ill-informed and elementary understanding of the moral complexities of
human beings. Sometimes those who we assume to be responsible and law-abiding,
have moral lapses with fatal consequences as well.
However, the right is
correct in recognizing the fact that creating a new gun law every time
that the nation has its collective conscience pricked
by some heart-wrenching murder or group of murders does little to change
the culture of violence faced by our nation. These measures, while politically
customary, are the equivalent of putting a band-aid on a gun-shot wound.
This is not a problem that can be simply fixed by a few gun laws. Crime
and violence are problems that require holistic solutions. A poor economy,
decimated moral climate, the weakened family structure, and poor access to
education and mental health services all play a factor in what produces crime.
It is no accident that a recent Forbes study showing the 10 most violent
cities in America reflected cities in which this horrible cocktail of social
problems was consistent. When a political group’s response to the tragedies
we’ve faced only concerns guns, their overly simplistic and patronizing
solutions insult our intelligence and bring into question their true commitment
to solving this dilemma.
Changing the current climate will require a seriously non-partisan and thoughtful
exploration of the true causes of crime. It will equally offend both sides
of the aisle and call for equal concessions on deeply held political positions.
There will be no change in this nation without it. While I am disappointed
in the tepid policy solutions being pushed, I am heartened that at least
a national conversation is occurring. If we miss this opportunity to do something
significant now, I am afraid that the violence we see so frequently will
persist with no end in sight. My prayers are that our nation can exhibit
a level of political and intellectual maturity that will produce long-term
solutions and benefits for generations to come. Our children are counting
Wintemute, GJ, Teret, SP, et al. "The Choice of Weapons in Firearm Suicides." Am
J Public Health. 78:7 (1988):824-826.