By
Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
Medford, OR - On the afternoon of July 25, 2012 David West was returning
home from work when he saw a familiar Radar Enforcement Van operated by the
City of Medford, Oregon. This van had been parked in his neighborhood before
and it posed concern for West.
MPD Officer Erik Baines
|
West, 22 years of age is an aspiring
filmmaker and is described as an astute man who is knowledgeable and active
in politics and civil/human rights. West
decided to protest the van that afternoon while recording himself. Within
10 minutes of protesting the van, West was ordered at gunpoint by Officer
Erik Baines of Medford Police Department (MPD) to the ground, put in "double
locked" handcuffs and arrested for disorderly conduct.
According to Officer Baines’ police report, West decided to protest
that day because, “He sees that van out on Garfield (street) two or
three times a week and feels the police should be out looking for criminals,
not code violators." West had made a sign to protest the radar van,
set up his video camera across the street, and was peacefully protesting
when the van operator - Michael Blair, a retired Detective with MPD made
contact with him, which was confirmed by video obtained.
As described by Blair's statement
to Officer Baines, Blair asked, "If
West had gotten a ticket from the van and West said he had not." Blair
also asked, "If the sign was for him and West said it was." Blair
then asked West if he would like a drink of water and West politely declined.
Although the audio portion was not clear on video, you could see the conversation
was brief, and David was clearly not creating a disturbance as reported by
Blair on dispatch audio recordings. West stated that before Blair ended the
conversation, he called West a "Whiny Boy" and said, "Have
a good day Whiny Boy", to which West replied, "You have a good
day too, fat ass."
A few minutes later,
West headed to the rear of the van and stated, "He
made sure there were no vehicles approaching", and is seen on video
running across the street. This is important because according to Blair's
report of the incident and arresting Officer Baines police report West was "Lodged
after blocking traffic...” but West never blocked traffic.
Nearly six months after West was arrested, on January 9, 2013, Officer Baines
testified that Blair had told him West blocked two vehicles on Garfield Street
for 10-20 seconds - this was clearly a lie and disproved by video footage
of the entire incident. If responding officers would have reviewed the video,
which West requested at the time of his arrest, they would have easily seen
that Blair was lying, but they either didn't review the video, or clearly
disregarded the evidence on the video.
According to Officer Baines'
report, one of two witnesses stated, "She did not see him in the
street interfering with traffic." The other witness also made no
claim that West obstructed or blocked traffic.
Multiple Officers who
responded on scene testified at West's hearing on January 9, 2013. MPD
Detective
Justin Ivens stated he has been an MPD officer
for "seventeen years" and testified to hearing "Stress" in
Blair's voice while listening to Blair's call to dispatch. Lieutenant Whipple
testified that he heard "Stress" in Blair's voice. Arresting Officer
Erik Baines testified to hearing "heightened anxiety" in Blair's
voice. All officers who testified admitted to discussing the case prior to
testimony and Officer Baines testified to talking to Medford’s Senior
Assistant City Attorney, Kevin McConnell, about Blair's tone of voice prior
to the hearing. After listening to the call made to dispatch by Blair, I
was puzzled that the officers would all say the same thing about Blair's "Stress",
which was not even close to apparent while listening to his recorded conversation
with dispatch. Blair even stated during his call, "Just be advised so
far he hasn't menaced me..."
Detective Justin Ivens on a recording
obtained from the date of West's arrest stated to West, "I just don't
want, more than anything, we can't have this. I understand your frustration.
This isn't the way to go about demonstrating
it." There is no law against protesting because it is protected by the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is the supreme law in
the United States, so why was Ivens compelled to make that statement to West?
Officer Ivens also stated to West, "Believe it or not, the number one
complaint in the City of Medford is speeding vehicles from citizens." This
is another example of how an officer can create a fabrication to validate
his abusive actions. According the city of Medford's own website, reported
offences for the entire year of 2012 were recently published and speeding
vehicles was not even in the top
10 on the list.
Arresting
Officer Baines stated to West, "You seem like you got some,
a brain between your ears and it's just kind of a poor decision." What
was Officer Baines referring to? What law had David West violated?
While transporting West
to jail, Baines stated, "So here is the deal,
you're being charged with disorderly conduct. I'm gonna have the jail hold
you overnight and you should be arraigned by the municipal court judge tomorrow
morning."
David
West is astute because he stands up for his rights, and more importantly,
he exercises
his rights, whether protesting a radar van is your cup of tea
or not, that is not reason enough to arrest someone. What happened is simply
wrong, unlawful, and a clear and present danger to all citizens in Medford,
Oregon. If the police can conspire and create evidence against David West,
what are their actions on a daily basis? I am an advocate for transparency
and honesty, especially in government and this is not good for the rest of
MPD, especially the officers who do their job the right way, every day.
"The
real reason why David West was arrested"
Photo: David West
|
David
West often open carries a firearm; a handgun which is kept secure in
a holster on his belt
at all
times. He has taken firearm safety courses
and has valid Concealed Carry Permits from the states of Oregon and Utah.
West had a .357 magnum revolver carried openly on his person that day while
in public, which is legal in almost every city in Oregon, even without
a concealed carry permit. West's sign read: "Tax Whore Pig",
to describe his view of revenue generating practices for the city. While
carrying a firearm
and holding a sign like that is clearly not something often seen in public,
that doesn't make it illegal. So, after responding to the scene and forcing
West to the ground at gunpoint, placing him in handcuffs, stuffing him
into the back of a patrol car and reading him his Miranda rights, what
options
did MPD have after finding out that West never threatened anyone or un-holstered
his pistol, and has a CCW permit and no criminal history whatsoever?
The only logical explanations
are that the responding officers either attempted to lie, or Blair lied
to the responding officers. Either way, the responding
officers had West's permission to view his video, which was barely over eleven
minutes long and learn the truth and then they could have released him. They
did not do that. Instead, they went along with Blair, and probably even conspired
with him to make the arrest? They also obviously conspired prior to court
when they all testified about the "stress" in Blair's voice, which
wasn't even mentioned in the police report.
A copy of the exculpatory video
that West had taken was secured by the defense when its release was negotiated
by West’s attorney Nathan Wente several
weeks after his release from jail. Apparently no one at MPD or the city prosecutor's
office observed the video, despite having both West’s camera and memory
card in their evidence locker for nearly 6 months.
After West had his pre-trial
hearing and the officers had testified, Nathan Wente, West's attorney,
shared the
video with the prosecutor, McConnell.
McConnell filed a "Motion to Dismiss" on January 11, 2013 and Mr.
West's charges were formally dismissed less than one week later by Municipal
Judge William P. Haberlach.
If this writer's bias or opinion is too strong in this article, please let
the decision from the city prosecutor to dismiss the charges before trial
be evidence enough that what has been reported is absolute fact. If you reside
in Southern Oregon and are facing criminal charges, I would highly recommend
Nathan Wente. He decided to withhold the video until after the officers testified.
Smart move Mr. Wente.
Please note that although Michael
Blair is not a "Police Officer" at
MPD, he is a retired police officer, he operates a vehicle that takes photos
of speeding cars (which results in citations), his paycheck is from the City
of Medford, and he is a government employee. Had he not lied to dispatch
that day, it is likely that West would have never been arrested.
Had West not decided
to video his peaceful protest on July 25, 2012, one must assume he would
have been convicted - another loon with a gun, another
notch on the conviction belt for the prosecutor, and, most certainly, another
lie resulting in arrest and conviction for MPD.
Editor’s
Note: The facts in this article are extremely alarming given the long
track record of lies,
deceptions and attempted false prosecutions
resulting from the actions by the Medford Police Department.
For the past 12 years the US~Observer has provided the public with irrefutable
proof that numerous MPD officers have involved themselves in committing actual
crimes against innocent citizens. All MPD officers need to be aware that
these bad officers make them look bad.
The US~Observer
is giving public notice to Medford Municipal Court Judge William P. Haberlach
(the judge
that presided over David West’s preliminary
hearing) that if he fails to take substantial actions against the officers
who lied and conspired against David West that he is just as guilty of lying
and conspiring as the officers. We also give notice to Medford Chief of Police
Tim George that he is responsible for the actions of his officers – If
George fails to stop this severe abuse, he is just as guilty as the officers
who lie and conspire resulting in false charges against citizens of Medford,
Oregon.
Can we expect
any of these individuals to demand accountability as opposed to covering
up corruption? Unfortunately,
no we cannot…