“Oh no...
I couldn't have possibly known I was selected for jury duty; I've been
out of town!”
Similar excuses
may have worked while telling a teacher your homework was incomplete
- years ago. However, in a court of law, such excuses are limited. The
anticipation of becoming a Juror is abhorred by most, for whatever possible
reason, and there
are many. The moment that letter is received, informing you of the
special date to appear, you start searching for the perfect reason to
excuse yourself, "I'll do almost anything to avoid jury duty..."
Should that be your
response?
Is there an automatic
assumption of guilt when someone has been charged with a crime? Are
jurors not adequately compensated? Set aside the list of excuses to
avoid jury duty, put yourself in the shoes of the person relying on
your service, and talk about it.
Consider this; you
are the defendant, and you are innocent (which ALL defendants are "presumed"
to be). You are the 3-5% of those criminally charged in the U.S. willing
to roll the dice at trial. You are relying on the professionalism and
strategy of your attorney. You are also up against a government that
has no limit to its reach. Unlimited funds are being used to gather
evidence against you - even if the
evidence is questionable, or, false.
Sharp looking experts with astonishing credentials and resumes are lining
up for the prosecution to bolster the charges leveled against you. The
media has already published your name, photograph, and the crimes you
have been charged with, and seemingly more often, they've added a blurb
from someone in uniform that purports guilt. The published photograph
is usually an unfavorable mug shot. There's a police report published,
claiming there is FACTUALLY a victim. Still, after all of the pressure
by government and media implying guilt, you believe the evidence will
prove opposite. You refuse to accept that a juror will believe a person
wearing a badge instead of you, your attorney, or the evidence. Despite
how optimistic you feel about your case, you know being convicted is
possible.
Citizen and police
video on social media, exonerations of people falsely convicted, egregious
mandatory minimum sentencing, discovery of faulty forensic science,
and films such as "Making a Murderer," have undoubtedly fueled
public scrutiny over the tactics used by law enforcement at all levels.
These important issues, in part, have contributed toward the National
push toward Criminal Justice Reform.
Could this be your
calling, to help stop a wrongful conviction? Or, is this your chance
to help lock away a dangerous criminal?
A juror is potential
relief from an abusive government, a vexatious litigant, or, a fictitious
victim. Jurors also convict. Serving as a juror should not be a burden,
it should reinforce the belief that justice is being served, regardless
of the verdict. Being a Juror is one of the most important responsibilities
ever bestowed upon an individual - Juror's hold someone's life in their
hands. Some day it could very well be your life in question, including
the life of those who depend on you, and for that reason alone,
you should re-think jury duty.
Who would you want
to be your juror? By answering this, you may have just found the reason
to stop making excuses. And for those of you who take this duty serious;
salute!
This article
is part of a series on juries in the United States. Our next piece in
this series will talk about modern juries and important concerns they
should have, but often may not consider. Are juries today different
from those not so long ago? Has the role of a juror been impeded?
Subscribe to the US~Observer News Flash Alerts!
Subscribe
to the US~Observer FREE News Alerts!
Get
a subscription to US~Observer delivered right to your mailbox via first-class mail!