Cougar
Lawsuit Press Release
Update From ORCAS
(Oregon Rural Citizens Against Subterfuge)
We
filed our lawsuit on April 4, 2006, one day later than our original
target date due to circumstances that we have to live with. The State
Attorney General was served on April 4th, and the ODFW on April 6th.
What happens now is that 20 days after the 6th of April we will file
a motion for Summary Judgment, which will outline our legal authority,
case law, arguments, and prayer for relief. What that means is we will
present why Measure 18, despite being voted on twice by the voters of
the State of Oregon, should not have been implemented as it is unconstitutional.
Article 1 Section 18 reads as follows, “Private property shall
not be taken for public use, nor the particular services of any man
be demanded, without just compensation; nor except in the case of the
state, without such compensation first assessed and tendered; provided
that the use of all roads, ways and waterways necessary to promote the
transportation of the raw products of mine or farm or forest or water
for beneficial use or drainage is necessary for the development and
welfare of the state and is declared for public use.” What this
means is under Hawkins v City of La Grande 843 P2d 400 OR 1992, the
Court of Appeals ruled the killing of Livestock and the Destruction
of Crops by any Governmentally instituted Action (Measure 18) shall
be considered Permanently “Taken” for the purposes of taking
under Article 1 Section 18 of the Constitution of Oregon. This very
clearly defines our legal standing and the fact that despite twice being
voted on by the voters of Oregon Measure 18 violated the Constitutional
rights of private property owners and goes bye, bye.
Our
other argument goes a step further in asserting our rights. 76% of Rural
Citizens voted against Measure 18. It only passed due to the overwhelming
majority of Urban Citizens who are privileged and immune from the effects
of increased Cougar and Bear Predation and the damages they cause livestock
and property. Article 1 Section 20 reads as follows; NO LAW shall be
passed granting to any citizen or group of citizens privileges, or immunities,
which upon the same terms, shall not EQUALLY belong to all citizens.
Now, reading that and looking closely at the Supreme Court’s decision
on Measure 37 where the court found that the measure created the class
of property owners and therefore there was no protected class. And,
if they class claiming lack of privilege or immunity could change their
circumstances, in our case moving from rural communities to Urban. Aside
from being impractical, it would be virtually impossible due to restrictions
and space available in Urban areas to farm, grow trees, a lot of crops,
hay, etc.
What
does all this mean, well folks it means that the Rural Citizens of Oregon
are claiming that they are and should be declared a protected class
such that their concerns, privilege and immunity should be equal under
the law with those of Urban Citizens. Now, if say Portland were to import
3,000 cougars and 12,000 black bears and turn them loose in their city
on their citizens, and Salem some 1,800 cougar and 8,000 black bear,
and Eugene/Springfield were to take 984 cougar and 4,200 black bear
into their midst then things might be a little more equal and they would
not be so privileged and immune (Just a thought that would be an option
for the court to consider as an order to make things constitutional
under Article Section 20). As you can see folks it really doesn’t
matter what anyone thinks or feels is right. Is it Constitutional or
Not: that is the real issue. Over the years we have put our Constitutions
at the back of the law, but they were the beginning inception for all
laws we have today. Article 1 is our Bill of Rights and the highest
law in the land under which all others have been decided and made. I
hope this clarifies our position and that we are not just trophy hunters,
or dog hunters. We are Citizens of Oregon taking back our laws and way
of life and even our voice to insure that all citizens share equally
in our way of life. We are asking in the relief that not only Measure
18 be struck down and goes away but that Cougar and Bear populations
are returned to pre-1994 levels and that the over 6 million deer and
elk slaughtered by mismanagement, by ODFW sitting on their butts collecting
our fees are replaced at any expense and cost.
Thank
you for your support and assistance which so many of you have given
in the past and I hope that you will continue to support our many future
causes giving back the voice of Rural Citizens of Oregon.
Wil
Clow, Director ORCAS
2701 Coed Place
Grants Pass, OR 97527
(541) 472-8457
nafiwclw@charter.net