Wildlife
Biologists Saviors or Vitiators?
By Bud Sonnentag
The majority of
our states’ fish and game agencies are under the control and direction
of biologists. They alone make every rule and regulation concerning
the management of all wildlife in the North American continent, including
Canada. Every man, woman, and child is directly impacted by the power
they wield through their management plans and decisions they make from
day to day regarding wildlife, especially mountain lions. Make no mistake…biologists
are the vitiators of all our wildlife problems and not our commissioners,
legislators, or hunter sportsmen as you might think. If I thought for
a second that biologists were saviors, I would never have called them
eco-terrorists. Commissioners and legislators are involved in politics
to formulate and institute the laws that biologists concoct in the name
of science…rightly or wrongly. Biologists learn quickly to guard
what they say publicly or risk getting crosswise with administration
policy and being excommunicated by their state or federal agencies.
You can bet what biologists do say publicly on television or in news
print will be disguised as science but calculated to be propaganda to
move public sentiment in a favorable direction to benefit their agency.
Our state and federal fish and game agencies have no shortage of bunny
huggers and tree lovers willing to support them. Mother earth and her
wildlife have become a cult religion with hundreds of animal societies
jockeying to be the “Pope”—biologists weaseling their
way in as high priests and the hunter sportsman trying to get all of
them in his sights.
Just 25% of the
nation has a college or university degree of some sort or another. That
means the other 75% of our nation hold a high school diploma or less.
In order to be employed as a biologist by any state or federal wildlife
agency, one must have a BS degree…. the minimum to qualify and
the lowest degree offered in the collegiate system. This excludes everyone
with a high school education who relies on experience and a common sense
approach to wildlife management. This time proven method has been handed
down from father to son for generations and was the cause, thinking
and under-pinnings for the creation of the famous Pittman Robertson
Act. P.R. was not instituted by diploma carrying biologists. Today,
young people come out of our colleges to enter wildlife agencies as
mere children having been indoctrinated by very liberal professors in
liberal colleges who promote protectionism, environmentalism and preservationism
and not necessarily conservation. Many of these neophytes do not understand
the concept of predation management the way older hunter sportsmen do
through hands on experience and a high school diploma. These new recruits
enter an atmosphere where the direction of wildlife has been preordained
by cronies 50 years before they got there and are quickly informed not
to buck the system or say anything that will make waves…or else!
All of this is done under the guise of science by people who hold nothing
more than a Bachelor of Science degree. By the sacred cow called education
we glorify these four year graduates as scientists and experts who have
no experience and we elevate them above ourselves. They are now ready
to work their way up through a stiff necked system the way everyone
did before them. The past system guarantees there will be NO present
or future apostates in their wildlife administration. This explains
why you never see any change in wildlife management throughout our state
and federal agencies. Change is condemned not encouraged. Criticism
smacks of their predecessors being wrong which is not thinkable. Winston
Churchill was on the right track when he said “Anyone who is not
a liberal in his youth has no heart: Anyone who remains so as he matures
has no brains.” Touché! This sort of wildlife management
in our state and federal agencies sets up a revolving chain of protectionism
and not conservation by this stifling system and can be traced directly
to biologist’s mentality.
I’ve never
had theses problems pointed out as clearly as I did on April 9, 2006.
A biologist by the name of Carl Lackey from Nevada Department of Wildlife
(NDOW) was called to investigate a mountain lion sighting and serious
disturbance at my friend’s ranch in Genoa, Nevada. This would
not have been so ludicrous except that this biologist is considered
thee Nevada “expert” in bear and mountain lion matters and
personifies everything I have written. Upon arriving at the ranch Carl
Lackey said to my friend; “I am not allowed to speak on any matters
of the mountain lion that might involve the department in any controversy.”
NDOW”S image be damned—there was a dead calf here. Carl
Lackey didn’t dare answer my friend’s piercing questions
with the truth because that didn’t fit 60 years of state and federal
research and furthermore runs counter to NDOW policy. All this happened
in the presence of several witnesses. This is an on-going daily recurrence
throughout the western states wildlife agencies. My own 24 year old
son endured the same stupidity by a California biologist on March 28,
2006. After seeing mountain lions far too frequently around his house,
he called a California game biologist to discuss the urgency of the
matter. He got the same response as my Genoa friend. Can you believe
my son lives in Burbank, California of all places and well within sight
of all the movie studios? Needless to say my son “mauled”
the biologist good and proper with the facts and truth about mountain
lions…. bless his soul. We permit these biologists to get away
with this behavior because of the lack of education on our part. When
they realize we are informed about mountain lions and stand up to them,
they’re spooked. They instantly become aware that if you keep
pressing them with facts you’re going to force them to lie or
go against administration policy. I personally have lost all respect
for biologists of this kind.
All sciences follow
empirical laws and all sciences encourage examination, debate and free
thinking. All strive for the facts—the truth. Just by these criteria
alone it is easy to see that wildlife management fails the science test
and is nothing more than a pseudo science at best. It attains its elevated
status by attaching itself to biology and biologists. That’s about
as close as wildlife management will ever come to being a science. From
there it gravitates to such things as duplicity, confusion, distortion
of facts and even lying. Because biologists have the diploma and we
don’t, they convince the nation that their guess is better than
our experience and common sense. Education, which we have glorified,
has come full circle and knifes us all in the back. With this type of
wildlife management, everyone, anti’s and conservationists alike
come out losers. Like my mother told me—you can’t have your
cake and eat it too. We can have lots of mountain lions or lots of “wildlife”—but
not both. With mountain lions we are guaranteed lots of deaths and carnage
with never any rest or peace. If you worship mountain lions, I ask you
to look at your child or grandchild pensively and view them as “mountain
lion food” or God forbid—“Scat.” As I said—I
have no respect for people like this, especially biologists who have
led this country into such a morass. Most of them knew better but did
nothing to stop it or head it off. The height of stupidity in wildlife
management came when the U.S. F. & W.S. chose on their own to reintroduce
the wolf to Montana and Wyoming. Wildlife management policies in our
Fish & Game agencies will not permit or encourage open debate, policy
examination, criticism and God forbid beneficial change. Unless “we”
change it, we can expect to remain under this yoke of oligarchy forever.
I believe in an informed, educated public and a democratic government.
In other words...Our American dream. Thank heavens the U.S. Observer
thinks the same way.
Bud
Sonnentag can be reached at PO Box 72, Gabbs, Nevada 89409 or huntersalert@huntersalert.org.