By
Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
West Palm Beach,
Florida -
In an 11th hour attempt to sway Judge Colbath's decision to allow
John Goodman's blood evidence at his next trial, Prosecutor Sherri
Collins has pulled yet another unbelievable magic trick. Could
it backfire?
Former Florida
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Senior Crime Laboratory Analyst
in the
Alcohol Testing Program and also the Alcohol Testing Program
Manager Laura Barfield testified on Monday that before she left her
position, she was in the middle of changing Florida rules on blood
draws. The significance of her testimony was directly related to John
Goodman's case. She stated under oath that Florida is behind times
with regards to law enforcement blood draw procedures. Many other states
require that law enforcement does not deviate from their blood draw
kits, which happened in John Goodman's case when nurse Cecilia Betts
used an alternative needle, not part of the kit. The size of the needle
used by Betts "causes hemolysis (damaged red blood cells)," according
to many professional reports, which presented another significant problem,
also confirmed by Barfield.
The theory is that smaller needles damage red blood cells during the
blood draw process, which produces an inaccurate representation of
the blood being drawn. Basically, damaged red blood cells compromise
the accuracy of the test, likely increasing the blood alcohol levels
according to Barfield.
Smaller butterfly needle vs standard 21 guage needle
effects dui blood analysis
|
Keep in mind that
Laura Barfield is the former head of FDLE's Alcohol Testing Program.
She
is a former government employee who has now testified
before Judge Colbath regarding the blood draw problems with the state's
case against Goodman, on the record. Judge Colbath ruled against the
recent defense motions regarding the blood evidence on Oct. 3, basically
saying that what Barfield had to say will not be allowed to be presented
to the jury during Goodman's upcoming trial. Judge Colbath's order
of denial stated, "Barfield's conclusion about the effect
of hemolysis in this case is not the product of reliable principles
and methods."
Nurse Betts will allegedly
be allowed to testify that she used a 23, not a 25 guage needle,
despite what was annotated on records, and previously
testified to during the first trial. The reality of this is that the
23 guage needle is larger than the 25 guage, which could be preceived
as an appropriate needle size that would not damage the red blood cells
and... wala, Sherri Collins saves the day by getting Betts to change
her testimony about needle size (doesn't matter if a 21 guage is the "standard
size”). Colbath also disallowed more time for the defense to
ask experts if in fact the 23 guage needle would remedy the damaged
blood theory, which caused concern since jury selection started this
Monday, Oct. 6. In essence, Florida is trailing many other states in
being transparent in the field of blood draws. The rules regarding
blood draws are vague and ambiguous, only requiring use of a "standard
needle," which at this point in time can come from another source
other than the law enforcement kit.
How convenient
that Sherri Collins goes out of her way to get nurse Betts to retract
something that she already testified under oath about,
and annotated on a medical document nearly four years ago. So, is it
safe to presume that the nurse originally lied under oath, and on her
medical records, or is she lying now, at the direction of Assistant
State Attorney Sherri Collins? Simple mistakes should not be allowed
in this line of work, especially when they can result in a 30 year
prison sentence.
How significant is all of this? That depends on who you ask. There
is still the issue with Goodman consuming alcohol post crash. The evidence
showing he drank post crash is much stronger than the first trial,
which can be viewed
here.
One fact remains
- Goodman will never receive a fair trial at this point, especially
with Colbath presiding. Goodman was convicted long
ago by the mainstream media, and the state has disposed of his car,
arguably the most important piece of evidence. I find it confusing
how many people today agree that government is corrupt
and the mainstream media are mostly repeaters,
not reporters, yet people buy the government issued, one-sided mainstream
details regarding criminal cases; especially when the repeat (report)
involves a tragic death, and an allegedly intoxicated "billionaire."
Sadly,
this is the world we live in today. Many people only oppose that
which
does not reflect their individual bias.
Read all about the John Goodman case here.