Loading…

Strip Club Protestors Fire Back

By US~Observer Staff

Douglas County, OR — On or about July 12, 2006 the Josephine County residents who actively participated in the protesting of Club 71, the county’s only strip club, and who were targeted by club owner Larry Lacey, his attorney Claud Ingram, and a Club 71 regular patron Greg Staton in two separate but strikingly similar lawsuits, have filed suit against Ingram and Staten claiming, “damages for wrongful use of civil proceedings (ORS § 31.230), intentional, reckless, or negligent infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy.”

The protestors, Dorothy Sims, Herbert Gelwick, Jerry Franklin, Jeanette Franklin, Tiffany Gendron, Carl Pierce, Jan Pierce, Garry Rose, Olivia Wytcherley, and Carol Ahlf all contend in their lawsuit filing that Lacey, through his attorney Ingram, and Greg Staten, did maliciously file suit against them for the following, “unlawful and improper purposes: to retaliate against Plaintiffs for their exercise of First Amendment rights; to intimidate and discourage Plaintiffs from engaging in further demonstration activity at Club 71; to harass them; and to cause them severe emotional distress.” Both prior suits against the named protestors were dismissed. In Lacey’s case against them he was ordered to pay approximately $19,000 in attorneys’ fees, and Staten’s suit Staten moved to voluntarily dismiss his action against these named individuals as he admitted under oath that he had no knowledge that any of the defendants (those demonstrators named herein) committed any of the acts that formed the basis of his lawsuit.

The protestors listed above have been successfully represented by the AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION (AFA) CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY (www.afa.net) a not-for-profit organization who according to their web site, “responds to the requests of Christians for legal representation involving first amendment free speech and free exercise rights as well as the constitutional issues involved in the continuing battle against pornography and obscenity.”

The protestors are seeking total compensatory damages in excess of $10 million, punitive damages to be determined by a jury, litigation and attorneys’ fees, as well as any other relief they may be entitled to.

Editor’s Note: The US~Observer will keep you informed on the status of this suit as it unfolds.

Share it :

Related Articles

prosecutor-find-crime

Prosecutor Filed a Crime That Isn’t There — Then Offered Her a Class If She’d Stay Quiet

Seven-year divorce settlement following family law attorney investigation

Seven-Year Divorce Settlement Reached 62 Days from when US~Observer Investigation began on Attorney Bryan Ciyou

Will Arizona Voters Vote Against Monica Edelstein for Alleged Application Fraud?

Vindicated

Keep Looking When the Story Doesn’t Add Up

The $15 Million Mistake I Made Fighting Federal Charges (And What Actually Won My Case)

When Your Defense Needs an Outside Voice

The System Isn’t Always Playing Fair

Is Your Lawyer Fighting Hard Enough for You?

When Attorney-Client Privilege Isn’t Absolute

Don’t Trust Your Lawyer Blindly

When Prosecutors Are Accused of Misconduct...

I Caught This Lawyer Stealing MILLIONS From His Clients

The Brady Rule: Why Evidence Disclosure Matters!

I Fought the Government for 15 Years And You Wouldn't Believe What They Did to Me

When Public Records Reveal More Questions...

The Power of Independent Investigation in Seeking Answers

A Wrongful Conviction Can Change a Life Forever!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *