US Attorneys Attack Elderly Lady Innocent Victim to Face Jury

By Edward Snook
Investigative Reporter 

Donna Kozak

Omaha, Nebraska – The federal trial of a completely innocent and elderly Nebraska resident, Donna Kozak, is currently scheduled to begin on July 28, 2014 in Omaha, Nebraska. Kozak is represented by Omaha Attorney David R. Stickman.
As previously reported in the US~Observer, “Donna Kozak is currently charged with nine felony crimes. Two counts pertain to tax crimes and seven counts pertain to filing false liens into the public record regarding an unrelated event. The U.S. Attorney’s Office via their indictment sums the tax charges up: “Beginning as early as 1997, and continuing until at least on or about December 13, 2012, in the District of Nebraska and elsewhere, the defendant, DONNA MARIE KOZAK, corruptly endeavored to obstruct and impede the due administration of the internal revenue laws by not filing federal individual income tax returns.
First off, Donna Kozak is completely incapable of ‘corruptly endeavoring’ to do anything. In 1996, Donna was a member of a local college faculty in her third of ten years of teaching adults English as a Second Language. According to witnesses, Donna is exceptionally academic and she is a wonderful Christian, mother and wife.”
The Prosecution
Department of Justice Attorneys Brian D. Bailey and Matthew R. Hoffman are currently prosecuting Kozak for the U.S. government. Neither attorney has questioned Ms. Kozak and neither knows the facts of this case. The same can be said of the Grand Jury whose Foreperson, along with Assistant U. S. Attorneys in Omaha, U.S. Attorney Deborah R. Gilg and Michael P. Norris, signed an undated and unattested indictment without calling Ms. Kozak for any testimony or to submit any evidence documents on her behalf. My previous article titled, “The Tax Protestor Trap – And Resulting Nightmare” explains very well how Kozak was deceived by professional tax-scam-artists into believing that she wasn’t required to file a federal 1040 income tax form.

Many well-educated and polished “tax experts,” including some ex-IRS agents and ex-government employees taught Kozak that federal income taxes were “voluntary” and they provided plenty of “proof” in the form of past Supreme Court decisions, statements by IRS officials and the IRS Tax Code itself to convince her they were correct. When the IRS and Kozak became at odds, these same professionals and others convinced Kozak that they had the “legal” remedies to resolve her disputes and the disputes of others associated with her.
These so-called experts left out one very important fact. The fact was that if Kozak were to be indicted and put on trial, the federal judge would instruct the jury that all U.S. citizens are required to file income tax forms if they earn beyond a specific amount of money. You see, Kozak paid her taxes, but she simply refused to file the Form 1040 because she came to have a specific belief about using that form. In fact, the withholding system actually created an overpayment of taxes for her and her husband for some years. The way the IRS system works is that if you file for past years, which the Kozaks have now done in order to bring closure to their circumstances, and there is a tax owed, you still must pay. But if you have an overpayment, and the filing is beyond 3 years, the IRS will not return any of that money. They keep it without crediting it to other taxes owed.
It will also be well-established at trial that the liens Donna submitted to a public record for a third party are not recognized remedies by the current system of government which is operating this country. During one interview Donna Kozak stated, “I feel very humiliated for having believed these people about alternate remedy processes. I had no idea that I was being deceived. I actually thought that I was being patriotic and attempting to correct my government that has gone so far off course.”
While there is sufficient evidence to prove that Donna Kozak is innocent, much of it will be inadmissible during her trial due to corrupted laws, court rules, etc. Actually, the only defense that Kozak will have when she faces her jury, will be her good faith belief that she wasn’t required to file and her belief that the liens she filed were appropriate remedies to keep court and IRS officials in check.
It is an ABSOLUTE fact that Donna Kozak did not have any intent to commit a crime, just as it is an ABSOLUTE fact that, just like hundreds of thousands of Americans, she believed her government was dysfunctional and corrupt and that she was doing her patriotic duty when she refused to file the forms and when she process-served a third-party’s liens for filing.
Ms. Kozak was factually a victim of extremely deceptive tax-protestor professionals, making it completely impossible for her to be a perpetrator of a crime. This situation is actually no different whatsoever from the countless elderly people in America who fall victim to phone scammers on a daily basis. The scammers easily convince the elderly they owe money for one thing or another – the scammers access the accounts of the elderly and the rest is history.
Donna Kozak should be found NOT Guilty. If there is any other finding, it will be due to the very same corruption that Ms. Kozak was attempting to correct. If her jury finds her guilty, they will all eventually read my articles and they will live out their days knowing they have ruined a completely innocent fellow American. Each and every public official, including the federal judge in her case will live each day of their lives wondering who has read about their treachery and abuse and I assure them that I will completely ruin their legacy and reputation before I am through.
Nothing could be worse than for an American public servant to wrongfully attack the citizens they are supposed to serve, especially the elderly. The US~Observer takes such things very seriously. It is hoped that other men and women in the Omaha area will pack the federal court trial, currently scheduled for July 28th at the Omaha Federal Courthouse, in support of learning about their public servants and the kind of (in)justice they are planning to carry out, because you never know if you will be next.