Loading…

FALSELY ACCUSED OF CHILD ABUSE WINS $3.1M — STILL NO CUSTODY

Rafaelina Duval

By Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter

Los Angeles, CA. – Rafaelina Duval recently won a civil lawsuit for $3.1 million when a jury found that California’s Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) “intentionally and willfully” seized her young son, Ryan, from her custody without a warrant and with malice at the young age of fifteen months old. 
Duval’s attorney, Shawn McMillan, said, “The law is very clear, and they (DCFS) get training on this; you cannot seize a child from its parents unless there’s an emergency.”  
After taking baby Ryan from his mother, social workers disallowed reunification, claiming that Duval had Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. This syndrome is when a parent intentionally makes a child sick to gain attention. The only catch: sources stated that Duval was never diagnosed with this syndrome; it was all just a “hunch” by social workers who don’t have the ability to diagnose!

Seven years later, Duval only receives an hour and a half of visitation with her son every two weeks.

Young Ryan is now eight years old.

In another report, Duval stated, “No money can ever satisfy how I feel.”
This case is a painful reminder that agencies like DCFS have little accountability within family courts. Mirroring that sentiment, a Judge in Oregon recently called child caseworkers/social workers “the custody police.” Cases like Duval’s are not limited to California. Another family who claimed to be a victim of DCFS stated, “How can they (DCFS) be held liable financially, while continuously separating a son from his reportedly loving mother?”

According to video reports, California State will be on the hook for the $3.1 million award, and the yet-to-be-determined amount for punitive damages will be personally paid by the DCFS employees who took her son.

Share it :

Related Articles

Seven-year divorce settlement following family law attorney investigation

Seven-Year Divorce Settlement Reached 62 Days from when US~Observer Investigation began on Attorney Bryan Ciyou

Will Arizona Voters Vote Against Monica Edelstein for Alleged Application Fraud?

Prosecutorial Immunity Defeated: Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Challenged in Faire Case

Prosecutors enjoy almost absolute immunity from liability for their official actions. That is until now in the case of James and Angela Faire v. Okanogan County, et al.

Vindicated

Keep Looking When the Story Doesn’t Add Up

The $15 Million Mistake I Made Fighting Federal Charges (And What Actually Won My Case)

When Your Defense Needs an Outside Voice

The System Isn’t Always Playing Fair

Is Your Lawyer Fighting Hard Enough for You?

When Attorney-Client Privilege Isn’t Absolute

Don’t Trust Your Lawyer Blindly

When Prosecutors Are Accused of Misconduct...

I Caught This Lawyer Stealing MILLIONS From His Clients

The Brady Rule: Why Evidence Disclosure Matters!

I Fought the Government for 15 Years And You Wouldn't Believe What They Did to Me

When Public Records Reveal More Questions...

The Power of Independent Investigation in Seeking Answers

A Wrongful Conviction Can Change a Life Forever!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *