
By Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
With the potential of Federal Agents targeting States that have legalized recreational marijuana, maybe the once thought to be conservative term, “NULLIFICATION,” is finally ripe for all walks of life?
Nullification as defined by Wikipedia reads: “Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional.” Nullification is deeper than this. Basically, jury nullification is when a jury finds someone on trial innocent because they disagree with the law.
Nullification can be applied in many ways. For example: if the ‘most popular’ kid at school says, “let’s play soccer today”, yet other kids say, “let’s play dodge ball” effectively changing the decision from the person who usually gets what is wanted – they have just nullified the process.
“…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both,
and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In a court of law, regardless of Federal or State, nullification often comes with consequence as most states do not permit the use of this concept – even though our Nation’s first Chief Justice, John Jay embraced and supported its use. Justice Jay stated, “…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In most courtrooms today, jurors are instructed to follow the law, only judging on determination of guilt, as instructed by Judges. Lawyers and their ilk have had hundreds of years to perfect this lie of determination – and the government, with police power, often enforces this concept. New Hampshire stands out as the only state in the U.S. that currently allows nullification to openly be discussed in court. In other courts, lawyers can be sanctioned, and jurors can be tossed off juries for mentioning such.
In these current, divisive times, let’s not forget we as voters have a way to fight back against the proverbial elephant (Federal and State courts).
Remember, the U.S. Constitution begins with the words, “We The People…” for a reason. Don’t forget that! If you don’t believe a law is just, then don’t convict! You have that power as a juror. Just remember, saying it out loud could get you excused from jury duty.
In the States that have already banned together to legalize recreational marijuana – this concept should be quite easy to accept since juries will be comprised of “peers.”
If you support marijuana laws, think about this: The United States has the highest incarceration rate (25%) per capita in the entire world, yet we only make up 5% of the world population. If you pay taxes, you’re paying for hundreds of thousands of arrests for marijuana. Arrests can lead to incarceration, and incarceration comes with costs to the taxpayer.
Know your rights! Like us, or follow us on Facebook!
Nullification: Traditionally Conservative, Now Mainstream?
By Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
With the potential of Federal Agents targeting States that have legalized recreational marijuana, maybe the once thought to be conservative term, “NULLIFICATION,” is finally ripe for all walks of life?
Nullification as defined by Wikipedia reads: “Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional.” Nullification is deeper than this. Basically, jury nullification is when a jury finds someone on trial innocent because they disagree with the law.
Nullification can be applied in many ways. For example: if the ‘most popular’ kid at school says, “let’s play soccer today”, yet other kids say, “let’s play dodge ball” effectively changing the decision from the person who usually gets what is wanted – they have just nullified the process.
In a court of law, regardless of Federal or State, nullification often comes with consequence as most states do not permit the use of this concept – even though our Nation’s first Chief Justice, John Jay embraced and supported its use. Justice Jay stated, “…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In most courtrooms today, jurors are instructed to follow the law, only judging on determination of guilt, as instructed by Judges. Lawyers and their ilk have had hundreds of years to perfect this lie of determination – and the government, with police power, often enforces this concept. New Hampshire stands out as the only state in the U.S. that currently allows nullification to openly be discussed in court. In other courts, lawyers can be sanctioned, and jurors can be tossed off juries for mentioning such.
In these current, divisive times, let’s not forget we as voters have a way to fight back against the proverbial elephant (Federal and State courts).
Remember, the U.S. Constitution begins with the words, “We The People…” for a reason. Don’t forget that! If you don’t believe a law is just, then don’t convict! You have that power as a juror. Just remember, saying it out loud could get you excused from jury duty.
In the States that have already banned together to legalize recreational marijuana – this concept should be quite easy to accept since juries will be comprised of “peers.”
If you support marijuana laws, think about this: The United States has the highest incarceration rate (25%) per capita in the entire world, yet we only make up 5% of the world population. If you pay taxes, you’re paying for hundreds of thousands of arrests for marijuana. Arrests can lead to incarceration, and incarceration comes with costs to the taxpayer.
Know your rights! Like us, or follow us on Facebook!
Related Articles
Sheriff Caught in Doggone Lie
By John Taft Investigative Reporter Grants Pass, OR — A Bulldog
A Good Cop Turned Bad?
“Sean Valdez, the Josephine County Sheriff’s Deputy who was recently arrested for the alleged assault of his teen-age fiancee, is currently on paid administrative leave.”
Watergate Politics Today – A Deal You Can’t Refuse
By Joseph Snook Investigative Reporter US~Observer America, 2010 – Ramped up
Ciyou & Associates, P.C., Attorneys at law; Concerns Raised About Attorney Bryan Ciyou’s Conduct in Client Defense
“Ciyou grew frustrated during the call, made personal and dismissive
Indiana Attorney Bryan Ciyou Accused of Malpractice and Excessive Billing – UPDATE
The US~Observer is continuing our investigation into Bryan Ciyou and
Vindicated
James F. Murder
The Parkers Felony Tax Crimes
The Morans 64-Federal Tax Felonies
Reno F. Murder
Angela F. Murder
Jimmy R. RICO, Grand Theft
Pepper R. RICO Charges, Grand Theft
Neil B. Felony Tax Evasion
James R. Misdemeanor Crimes
Shawn Y. Discrimination
Jerry K. Multiple Misdemeanors
Manuel M. Felony Perjury
Michelle M. Custody
Russ N. Firearms Felonies
Ella L. Assault & Resisting
The Bluetears DHS / Child Custody
Amber P. Victim of DHS Abuse
Kevin O. Assault
Kathy M. Government Abuse
David C. Divorce
Bud S. Felony Sex Abuse
Chris H. Felony Sex Abuse
Timothy T. Felony Sex Abuse
Bryan T. Felony Sex Abuse
Jessica M. Felony Sex Abuse
Michael Y. Sex Abuse
Matthew R. Sex Abuse in the 1st Degree
Jose V. Felony Gun Crimes
Paul C. Civil Rights Lawsuit
Jason S. Assault
Sarah W. DHS Abuse
Pamela F. RICO, Grand Theft
Chris J. Full Custody
David W. Disorderly Conduct
Dan Y. Menacing
Armando G. Rape
Rusty L. RICO, Grand Theft
Sheila R. RICO, Grand Theft
Recent Videos
A Wrongful Conviction Can Change a Life Forever!
Two Different Paths Toward Understanding the Truth
Every Courtroom Move Has a Reason Behind It #LegalStrategy
Legal Advocacy and Public Awareness Are Not the Same 👀 #CriminalJustice
Sometimes a Lawyer’s Silence Is Required by Ethics Rules!
A Strong Defense Often Depends on More Than Legal Representation!
After Years of Uncertainty, One Verdict Can Bring Closure #CriminalJustice
The Truth About Criminal Defense Private Investigators Most Defendants Never Learn
When Witness Credibility Becomes the Turning Point #CriminalJustice
The Facts You Don’t See May Change the Bigger Picture #CriminalJustice
Fight the Charges or Take a Plea? A Life-Changing Decision #CriminalJustice
Why Public Defenders Face Unique Challenges #PublicDefense #CriminalJustice
The Government Hid Evidence That Proved My Innocence for Seven Years
Courtroom Advocacy and Public Awareness Play Different Roles #CriminalJustice