
By Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
With the potential of Federal Agents targeting States that have legalized recreational marijuana, maybe the once thought to be conservative term, “NULLIFICATION,” is finally ripe for all walks of life?
Nullification as defined by Wikipedia reads: “Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional.” Nullification is deeper than this. Basically, jury nullification is when a jury finds someone on trial innocent because they disagree with the law.
Nullification can be applied in many ways. For example: if the ‘most popular’ kid at school says, “let’s play soccer today”, yet other kids say, “let’s play dodge ball” effectively changing the decision from the person who usually gets what is wanted – they have just nullified the process.
“…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both,
and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In a court of law, regardless of Federal or State, nullification often comes with consequence as most states do not permit the use of this concept – even though our Nation’s first Chief Justice, John Jay embraced and supported its use. Justice Jay stated, “…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In most courtrooms today, jurors are instructed to follow the law, only judging on determination of guilt, as instructed by Judges. Lawyers and their ilk have had hundreds of years to perfect this lie of determination – and the government, with police power, often enforces this concept. New Hampshire stands out as the only state in the U.S. that currently allows nullification to openly be discussed in court. In other courts, lawyers can be sanctioned, and jurors can be tossed off juries for mentioning such.
In these current, divisive times, let’s not forget we as voters have a way to fight back against the proverbial elephant (Federal and State courts).
Remember, the U.S. Constitution begins with the words, “We The People…” for a reason. Don’t forget that! If you don’t believe a law is just, then don’t convict! You have that power as a juror. Just remember, saying it out loud could get you excused from jury duty.
In the States that have already banned together to legalize recreational marijuana – this concept should be quite easy to accept since juries will be comprised of “peers.”
If you support marijuana laws, think about this: The United States has the highest incarceration rate (25%) per capita in the entire world, yet we only make up 5% of the world population. If you pay taxes, you’re paying for hundreds of thousands of arrests for marijuana. Arrests can lead to incarceration, and incarceration comes with costs to the taxpayer.
Know your rights! Like us, or follow us on Facebook!
Nullification: Traditionally Conservative, Now Mainstream?
By Joseph Snook
Investigative Reporter
With the potential of Federal Agents targeting States that have legalized recreational marijuana, maybe the once thought to be conservative term, “NULLIFICATION,” is finally ripe for all walks of life?
Nullification as defined by Wikipedia reads: “Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional.” Nullification is deeper than this. Basically, jury nullification is when a jury finds someone on trial innocent because they disagree with the law.
Nullification can be applied in many ways. For example: if the ‘most popular’ kid at school says, “let’s play soccer today”, yet other kids say, “let’s play dodge ball” effectively changing the decision from the person who usually gets what is wanted – they have just nullified the process.
In a court of law, regardless of Federal or State, nullification often comes with consequence as most states do not permit the use of this concept – even though our Nation’s first Chief Justice, John Jay embraced and supported its use. Justice Jay stated, “…you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy.”
In most courtrooms today, jurors are instructed to follow the law, only judging on determination of guilt, as instructed by Judges. Lawyers and their ilk have had hundreds of years to perfect this lie of determination – and the government, with police power, often enforces this concept. New Hampshire stands out as the only state in the U.S. that currently allows nullification to openly be discussed in court. In other courts, lawyers can be sanctioned, and jurors can be tossed off juries for mentioning such.
In these current, divisive times, let’s not forget we as voters have a way to fight back against the proverbial elephant (Federal and State courts).
Remember, the U.S. Constitution begins with the words, “We The People…” for a reason. Don’t forget that! If you don’t believe a law is just, then don’t convict! You have that power as a juror. Just remember, saying it out loud could get you excused from jury duty.
In the States that have already banned together to legalize recreational marijuana – this concept should be quite easy to accept since juries will be comprised of “peers.”
If you support marijuana laws, think about this: The United States has the highest incarceration rate (25%) per capita in the entire world, yet we only make up 5% of the world population. If you pay taxes, you’re paying for hundreds of thousands of arrests for marijuana. Arrests can lead to incarceration, and incarceration comes with costs to the taxpayer.
Know your rights! Like us, or follow us on Facebook!
Related Articles
Lawsuit Filed Against Florida’s Indian River County Sheriff’s Department
The US~Observer reports on a lawsuit filed against Florida’s Indian River County Sheriff’s Department.
Ohio judge suspended for ordering court spectator to take drug test
Man exonerated of first-degree rape charge in Saratoga County
Ciyou & Associates, P.C., Attorneys at Law; Concerns Raised About Bryan Ciyou’s Conduct in Client Defense
“Ciyou grew frustrated during the call, made personal and dismissive
Steve Phillips: “Don’t Worry – I’ve Got Your Back”
Dain Sansome — False Child Sex-Abuse Charges: Unanimous Acquittal
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Motion to Dismiss Rejected by Federal Court – Quantum BioPharma’s Expert Legal Team Defeats Major Market Maker
Vindicated
James F. Murder: James Faire False Murder Charges
The Parkers Felony Tax Crimes
The Morans 64-Federal Tax Felonies
Reno F. Murder
Angela F. Murder: Angela Nobilis-Faire Murder Charges Dismissed
Jimmy Rodgers RICO Case: RICO and Grand Theft Charges Dismissed
Pepper R. RICO Charges, Grand Theft
Neil Butler Felony Tax Evasion: Charges Dismissed
James Roberts Misdemeanor Case: Reckless Endangerment Defense Leads to Acquittal
Shawn Y. Discrimination
Jerry Keller Multiple Misdemeanors: Charges Dropped
Manuel Mairs Felony Perjury: Charges Dropped
Michelle M.: Child Custody Help Leads to Full Custody
Russ Newkirk Firearms Felonies: Case Dropped
Ella L. Assault & Resisting Arrest
The Bluetears DHS Child Custody Case
Amber P. Victim of DHS Abuse
Kevin Olsen Assault Case: Kevin Olsen Acquitted of Assault Charges
Kathy M. Government Abuse: Allegations of Government Misconduct
David C. Divorce: David Coley’s Nine-Year Divorce Finally Settled
Bud S. Felony Sex Abuse
Chris H. Felony Sex Abuse
Timothy T. Felony Sex Abuse
Bryan T. Felony Sex Abuse
Jessica M. Felony Sex Abuse
Michael Y. Sex Abuse
Matthew R. Sex Abuse in the 1st Degree
Jose V. Felony Gun Crimes
Paul C. Civil Rights Lawsuit
Jason S. Assault
Sarah W. DHS Abuse
Pamela F. RICO, Grand Theft
Chris J. Full Custody
David W. Disorderly Conduct
Dan Y. Menacing
Armando G. Rape
Rusty L. RICO, Grand Theft
Sheila R. RICO, Grand Theft
Recent Videos
Never Agree To THIS When Talking To a Lawyer
Why Your Attorney Is Legally Forbidden From Fully Defending You
The Rule That Lets Prosecutors Hide Evidence and Face Zero Consequences
Keep Looking When the Story Doesn’t Add Up
The $15 Million Mistake I Made Fighting Federal Charges (And What Actually Won My Case)
When Your Defense Needs an Outside Voice
The System Isn’t Always Playing Fair
Is Your Lawyer Fighting Hard Enough for You?
When Attorney-Client Privilege Isn’t Absolute
Don’t Trust Your Lawyer Blindly
When Prosecutors Are Accused of Misconduct...
I Caught This Lawyer Stealing MILLIONS From His Clients
The Brady Rule: Why Evidence Disclosure Matters!
I Fought the Government for 15 Years And You Wouldn't Believe What They Did to Me