Loading…

Prejudicial Judge John R. Stegner Applies for Idaho Supreme Court

 

By Edward Snook
Investigative Reporter

Judge John R. Stegner
Judge John R. Stegner

Idaho – Judge John R. Stegner who has been a judge in Latah County, Idaho since 1997 has applied for an open seat on the Idaho Supreme Court. Stegner seeks to replace Justice Daniel Eismann who has announced his retirement. Stegner and 14 others seek this position, which will be decided upon by July 2017.

Stegner Is Not Qualified

One example, clearly showing that Stegner is not qualified is that of his recent actions in the Walker case, out of Grangeville, Idaho.
On February 24, 2017, Attorney Wes Hoyt, Attorney for Dorothy Walker, filed a Motion to recuse Stegner from the Walker case due to his “Bias and Prejudice.” Hoyt gave numerous factually backed instances in his Motion proving that Stegner was indeed biased and prejudiced. The article featuring much of Hoyt’s Motion can be read here. Stegner subsequently removed himself from the case.
One of the Canons (rules) for judges in Idaho states, “A judge should personally observe the high standards so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary will be preserved.” (Canon 1.) Stegner has violated this Canon and others as well, showing he is completely unfit to sit on the Idaho Supreme Court. In fact, he should be removed from the position he currently holds as Judge for the Second District.


The Dorothy Walker Case Files:
• Alleged Fraudulent Survey Creates Nightmare for Landowners

• “Dysfunctional” Surveying System in Idaho – Walker’s Surveyors, “Ethics” and the Board

• Idaho Board Charges Surveyor Chad Erickson

• One Brave American Lady! – Survey Fraud & Shattered Justice in The Great State of Idaho
• Walker Surveying Nightmare – Costs Approaching $500K
• Motion Filed To Disqualify Judge in Walker Case

Share it :

Related Articles

Felony Charges Dropped

Fraudulent Investment Scheme Thwarted

Big Bear's First Mountain Bank was at the center of a financial scam that cost many people their life savings. Fortunately, for those who retained the Observer, they got money back and the criminals were brought to justice.
sara-wide

Seven-Year Divorce Settled in 62 Days After US~Observer Investigation

Vindicated

Convicted Over Accounts That Were Never Mine? | US Observer

Attorney-Client Privilege Isn’t Always Protected

We're Not in Their Club – And That's the Point | US Observer

5 Questions to Ask Your Attorney Before Making a Legal Decision | US Observer

11 Days Too Late | We Are Investigative Journalists, Not Attorneys

Charged With a Crime? Why Waiting Costs More Than You Think

Convicted but Innocent? What You Can Still Do

Charged With a Crime? Why Waiting Can Cost You

Everyone in the Courtroom Is a Lawyer Except You

Think Everything You Tell Your Lawyer Is Private? Think Again.

How to Take Control of Your Own Defense

Facing Criminal Charges? Don’t Let the System Wear You Down

What Happens When Prosecutors Bury Evidence? Usually Nothing

Charged With a Crime? Your Defense Team May Be Missing This

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *