Loading…

Our Lands Are No Longer Safe

By Cecil Fredi

There was a time when a family could enjoy the wide expanses of our western United States, being free to hike, explore, and camp at will with little or no fear. We can thank our prudent ancestors for this relaxing outdoor freedom we have enjoyed in the past.
Today it’s a different story, a different outdoors and a different experience. Today, our lands have become dangerous, hostile, and unsafe, all because of one animal—the mountain lion. For this, we can thank the heads of the game departments, the biologists, the brainless Wildlife commissioners, and their large following of protectionist preservationists.

What you will see written here are facts—not to scare you but to educate you and your loved ones.

Reno Gazette Journal, April 6, 2006. “Hunter shoots lion that charged his son.” This man and his son were lucky…he had a gun and had a split second to fire and kill it. In most cases like this, the outcome will usually be too gruesome and bloody to write about. But here is what the RGJ printed at the close of the article given to them by the California D.F.G. website. Mind you, these are just the topics in bold print. “What to do: Do not hike alone! Keep children close to you! Do not approach a lion! Do not run from a lion! Do not crouch down or bend over! Appear larger! Fight back if attacked!” There is one caveat missing here that begs to be added to the list. “Don’t leave the safety of your home!” Only this last warning is guaranteed to keep you safe. The other seven are nothing more than false security and lame ideas to keep the public from ever knowing what is really going on out there.

Mountain lion populations not only exploded out of control in recent years, but these carnivores are also reaching body weights that exceed anything in recorded history. Shown here are three lions killed in the last few months in Arizona and Oregon with body weights of approximately 220 pounds. Hey people! They don’t get this big eating Alpo, and the largest ever known was 250 pounds, killed in recent years. No wonder there are no deer, elk, and sheep left. What do you want, lots of wildlife or lots of lions? What do you want, a safe, enjoyable outdoor experience, or confinement inside your home where your children are being denied the privilege of an outdoor experience? With more lions, this is what we have to look forward to.

In eastern Oregon, lions kill bighorn sheep faster than the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife can fly the new transplants into the mountains. It’s such a terrifying experience for these sheep that after several have been killed by lions,s the rest “flee” the mountain range within days,s with no trace of where they went. Over and over again, ODFW keeps repeating this samecarnage—feedingg sheep to alreadyout-of-controll lions using sportsmen’s dollars to do it. This is called game management?

Bud Sonnentag wrote in the latest issue of the Observer that a tagged lion traveled 700 miles. Huh! That’s nothing. The current issue of “Western Houndsman” magazine demonstrates how far lions will travel. A female lion was GPS-collared and tracked over a nine-month period beginning in southwestern Utah, through Wyoming, over a 10,000-foot mountain range, then back to Utah,h and was killed in Colorado, an astounding distance of 830 miles,s which is unheard of for females. Take note that this information came to you in a magazine, not from a scientific or biological wildlife journal, a national TV news bulletin, or a game department, which it should have come from to keep you informed. There are only two things discernible in a lion’s mind—sex and food— with no room in there for much else, except to travel in search of both.

Being familiar with the lawsuit against Oregon’s Department of Fish and Wildlife, my Nevada associates and I know that repealing Measure 18 will not even begin to solve Oregon’s wildlife problems. The mountain lion must be put in a predator-unprotected class in Oregon as well as every western state,e or this problem will never go away. It has always been legal to use dogs to hunt lions in Nevada, yet the state still faces a severe mountain lion problem that is decimating its once-famous mule deer herd. Nevada has a quota of 340 lions a year, and only about half of that quota is filled. Texas offers no protection for lions, and it still has a serious mountain lion problem.

Based on research into human encounters with mountain lions, HUNTER’S ALERT strongly recommends avoiding these areas when choosing places in the western states for outdoor camping or recreation, especially with children. Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, California; any lands in California along the coastal mountains; Vancouver Island, including all of lower British Columbia; Big Bend National Park, Texas; and, last but not least, all federal and state lands where mountain lions receive any protection whatsoever, particularly in national parks. Beware!

Like me, you’re not an expert,t but you can surely see what the hell is going on. A renowned houndsman who hunted lions throughout the West documented that he killed about 1,500 of them in his career…1,100 in the Kaibab area of northwestern Arizona alone. Currently, in this very same area, Arizona wants to kill ten, yes 10 mountain lions to stop the slaughter of desert bighorn sheep. The lions have brought the sheep herd down 60 percent, from approximately 2,000 to fewer than 1,000. Hooray for the readership’s good old common sense, which has never been a consideration in wise management by wildlife biologists.

Comparing statements by two Arizona biologists illuminates the underlying motives of our state and federal fish and game agencies to deliberately deceive the public today. In the Las Vegas Sun, an article appeared on April 7, 2006, titled “Mountain lions in Arizona’s line of fire.” Arizona Game and Fish Department biologist Jim DeVos makes this statement. “Not every lion is killing sheep. We’re trying to focus on known kills and trying to remove that lion that is killing sheep.” Wake up, Mr. DeVos. All lions kill sheep if there are sheep in the area. You cannot guarantee that other lions will not replace the ten you intend to remove. Once again, this is a band-aid approach to a serious problem by biologists. Compare this statement to the following statement, and you be the judge. At the Mountain lion Workshop, January 13 and 14, 1976, page 118, John Phelps said, “The data we have indicates there’s no such thing as a stock killer. All lions kill stock when the opportunity comes.” Step up in front of the public, Jim DeVos, and drink your cup of swill; you earned it.

The cure for the lion problem is not being implemented by those with the power to do so. Let’s start with the department heads of the fish and game agencies. If this person truly wanted something done about lions, he would say to the biologists, ” You formulate a program to bring back our deer, or you are history! If the biologists wanted to do something about lions, their reports and studies would offer recommendations to solve the problem. And finally, the brainless Wildlife commissioners would say to the department heads, if you don’t bring back our deer, I’m going to the governor with a vote of “no confidence” in your ability, and you will be history.

Of course, in Nevada, wildlife commissioners are not appointed for their wildlife knowledge. It is the big fat political donation that gets them appointed. So being brainless about wildlife issues is the standard in Nevada. To prove this, in the 2001 legislative session, there was a bill that would have removed the mountain lion from the (false) big-game status. Who testified against the bill? A person who is now on the Wildlife Commission. That person is none other than Clint Bentley, a so-called sportsmen’s representative. There was a petition that would have increased harvest numbers (not quotas) for mountain lions. Clint Bentley cast the deciding vote against this. His reasoning was that he thought the Nevada Department of Wildlife might lose a few dollars from the sale of mountain lion tags. Because of lions, we are losing millions of dollars from the loss of our deer, but Clint Bentley is more concerned about the minuscule loss of revenue from lion tags. Now do you see why I called them brainless wildlife commissioners? By now you should realize that nothing good is going to happen from the people in charge. It will take a concerted effort from many sportsmen and concerned citizens to make the necessary change.

Cecil Fredi can be reached at huntersalert@huntersalert.org.

Share it :

Related Articles

Steve Phillips: “Don’t Worry – I’ve Got Your Back”

Jewell School District Superintendent responsible for potential a lawsuit?

Dain Sansome — False Child Sex-Abuse Charges: Unanimous Acquittal

QNTM - CIBC court ruling

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) Motion to Dismiss Rejected by Federal Court – Quantum BioPharma’s Expert Legal Team Defeats Major Market Maker

Vindicated

Never Agree To THIS When Talking To a Lawyer

Why Your Attorney Is Legally Forbidden From Fully Defending You

The Rule That Lets Prosecutors Hide Evidence and Face Zero Consequences

Keep Looking When the Story Doesn’t Add Up

The $15 Million Mistake I Made Fighting Federal Charges (And What Actually Won My Case)

When Your Defense Needs an Outside Voice

The System Isn’t Always Playing Fair

Is Your Lawyer Fighting Hard Enough for You?

When Attorney-Client Privilege Isn’t Absolute

Don’t Trust Your Lawyer Blindly

When Prosecutors Are Accused of Misconduct...

I Caught This Lawyer Stealing MILLIONS From His Clients

The Brady Rule: Why Evidence Disclosure Matters!

I Fought the Government for 15 Years And You Wouldn't Believe What They Did to Me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *